Coalitional Bargaining with Agent Type Uncertainty
نویسندگان
چکیده
Coalition formation is a problem of great interest in AI, allowing groups of autonomous, individually rational agents to form stable teams. Automating the negotiations underlying coalition formation is, naturally, of special concern. However, research to date in both AI and economics has largely ignored the potential presence of uncertainty in coalitional bargaining. We present a model of discounted coalitional bargaining where agents are uncertain about the types (or capabilities) of potential partners, and hence the value of a coalition. We cast the problem as a Bayesian game in extensive form, and describe its Perfect Bayesian Equilibria as the solutions to a polynomial program. We then present a heuristic algorithm using iterative coalition formation to approximate the optimal solution, and evaluate its performance.
منابع مشابه
Uniqueness of stationary equilibrium payoffs in coalitional bargaining
We study a model of sequential bargaining in which, in each period before an agreement is reached, a proposer is randomly selected, the proposer suggests a division of a pie of size one, each other agent either approves or rejects the proposal, and the proposal is implemented if the set of approving agents is a winning coalition for the proposer. We show that stationary equilibrium outcomes of ...
متن کاملCoalitional Bargaining with Markovian Proposers
The paper generalizes coalitional bargaining of the Baron-Ferejohn type (Eraslan and McLennan, 2006) to non-independent proposers. Widening the scope of possible proposer dynamics significantly, this allows for likely continued offers, alternating offers (Calvó-Armengol, 2001b), and deterministic dynamics such as clockwise rotation of proposers (Herrero, 1985). Existence of stationary subgame p...
متن کاملThe price of democracy in coalition formation
Whenever rational agents form coalitions to execute tasks, doing so via a decentralized negotiation process—while more robust and democratic—may lead to a loss of efficiency compared to a centralized solution. To quantify this loss, we introduce the notion of the Price of Democracy (PoD), which measures the amount of resources needlessly committed to the task(s) at hand. After defining this con...
متن کاملBargaining with a property rights owner
We consider a bargaining problem where one of the players, the intellectual property rights owner (IPRO) can allocate licenses for the use of this property among the interested parties (agents). The agents negotiate with him the allocation of licenses and the payments of the licensees to the IPRO. We state ve axioms and characterize the bargaining solutions which satisfy these axioms. In a sol...
متن کاملBargaining, Values and Implementation with Coalitional Externalities
The paper starts by proposing an explicit and intuitive bargaining process to analyze coalitional externalities, which we then use to generate a value allocation extending the Shapley value to partition function from games, the Rational Belief Shapley value (RBS). We investigate the strategic foundation of the value by constructing a mechanism implementing it. It extends existing models of mult...
متن کامل